團隊
ホーム >> 専門分野 >> 商標権紛争処理 >> Ruey-Sen Tsai
蔡瑞森 Ruey-Sen Tsai

Ruey-Sen Tsai Ruey-Sen Tsai

パートナー

聯絡方式

Ruey-Sen got his LL.B. degree from National Taiwan University and his LL.M. degree from Cornell Law School, and is qualified for practice in Taiwan as a lawyer, patent attorney and arbitrator. He focuses his practice in trademarks, patents, copyrights, domain names trade secrets, trade dress and other intellectual property disputes, and has been recognized as one of the leading IP lawyers in Taiwan by several independent surveys.

學歷

專業領域

Trademark;Patent; Copyright; Trade Secret; Domain Name Dispute; Trade Dress; Unfair Competition; E-Commerce; Licensing and Litigation

經歷

Assistant Professor, Institute of Technology Law, National Chiao Tung University Assistant Professor, Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, Taipei Medical University Committee, Intellectual Property Committee, Chinese National Federation of Industries Committee, Intellectual Property Committee, General Chamber of Commerce of the Republic of China Consulting Committee, Preparation Team of the Judicial Yuan (the authority in charge of judicial matters) for the Intellectual Property Court (the specialized court for IP litigations) Chairman, Non-Litigation Procedure Committee, Taiwan Bar Association Committee, Intellectual Property Committee, Taiwan Bar Association Panelist, Domain Name Dispute Resolution Provider, Science & Technology Law Institute, Institute for Information Industry Panelist, Domain Name Dispute Resolution Provider, Taipei Bar Association Chairman, Information and Copyright Committee, Taipei Bar Association

資格

admitted Attorney (1992) Patent Attorney, R.O.C. (Taiwan) (2009) Patent Agent (1992) Taipei Bar Association Hsinchu Bar Association Tainan Bar Association

語言

2023年 Letter of Consent Not Definitely Accepted for Trademark Coexistent Registration
LEXOLOGY
2023年 Trademark coexistent registration: letters of consent
ILO IP Newsletter (20231130)
2023年 Prior use: opposition or invalidation can only be filed if disputed trademark not registered in Taiwan
ILO IP Newsletter (20231030)
2023年 商標又は専利の取消後においても登録商標マーク又は専利証番号を表示することは公平交易法の違反となる
LEE & LI Bulletin - October 2023
2023年 Trademark Opposition or Invalidation based on Prior Use can be filed only if the based Trademark has not been registered in Taiwan
LEXOLOGY
2023年 Unauthorised use of Taiwan-registered trademarks in China does not Violate Taiwan Trademark Act
ILO IP Newsletter (20230925)
2023年 最高行政裁判所が商標の類否判断原則を判示
LEE & LI Bulletin - August 2023
2023年 Unauthorized Use of Taiwan Registered Trademarks in China Not Violate Taiwan Trademark Act
LEXOLOGY
2023年 Trademark or patent marking after revocation violates Fair Trade Act
LEXOLOGY, ILO IP Newsletter (20230710)
2023年 最高行政裁判所大法廷の統一見解:著名商標・標章の識別性又は信用名声の毀損に関する商標法上の著名商標とは、関連事業者又は消費者に普遍的に認知されている商標をいう
LEE & LI Bulletin - June 2023
2023年 Trademark or Patent Marking after Trademark or Patent Revoked Violate Fair Trade Act
LEXOLOGY
2023年 How well known must a well-known trademark be?
LEXOLOGY, ILO IP Newsletter (20230508)
2023年 最高裁、商標権侵害の鑑定要件を判示
LEE & LI Bulletin - April 2023
2023年 Supreme Administrative Court clarifies how to conduct similarity assessments in trademark disputes
LEXOLOGY, ILO IP Newsletter (20230417)
2023年 Unified Legal Opinion of Grand Chamber of Supreme Administrative Court: The well-known trademark referred to in the Trademark Act concerning the likelihood of detracting from the identity or reputation of well-known trademarks or marks refers to the trademarks that are widely recognized by relevant businesses or consumers
LEXOLOGY
2023年 Supreme Court provides guidance on evidentiary competence of trademark infringement assessments
LEXOLOGY, ILO IP Newsletter (20230306)
2023年 最高行政裁判所、商標の識別性による登録の例外原則を判示
LEE & LI Bulletin - February 2023
2023年 Supreme Administrative Court Reveals Principles of Determining Similarity of Trademarks
LEXOLOGY
2023年 BOY LONDON trademark application rejected for misleading consumers
ILO IP Newsletter (20230116)
2022年 最高行政裁判所における商標登録異議申立事件の審理段階では新事実の主張又は新証拠の提出をしてはならない
LEE & LI Bulletin - December 2022
2022年 Supreme Court Reveals Requirements for Adopting Trademark Infringement Assessment
LEXOLOGY
2022年 Parties may not submit new evidence during appeals of trademark cases before Supreme Administrative Court
Lexology、ILO IP Newsletter (20221121)
2022年 No New Facts or Evidence Admissible During Trial of Supreme Administrative Court in Trademark Opposition
LEXOLOGY
2022年 Supreme Administrative Court Reject Acquisition of Trademark Distinctiveness as Exception for Non-Registrability due to Misleading of Goods Origin
LEXOLOGY
2022年 知的財産及び商業裁判所、eコマース事業者が出店者による商標権侵害に責任を負うかどうかの判断基準を判示
LEE & LI Bulletin - August 2022
2022年 Use of SEO to improperly display trademarks in search results violates Fair Trade Act
Lexology、ILO IP Newsletter (20220801)
2022年 Use of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Technology to Improperly Display Trademarks in Search Results so as to Mislead Consumers Violate Fair Trade Act
Lexology
2022年 何人も、3年不使用の登録商標に対して取消審判を請求することができる
LEE & LI Bulletin - June 2022
2022年 Intellectual Property and Commercial Court defines criteria for determining whether e-commerce platforms are liable for onlinesellers' trademark infringement
ILO IP Newsletter (20220606)
2022年 Intellectual Property and Commercial Court Defines Criteria for Determining Whether E-commerce Platforms Liable for Online Sellers' Trademark Infringement
Lexology
2022年 Scope of protection for famous trademarks varies according to degree of fame
ILO IP Newsletter (20220509)
2022年 Scope of protection for famous trademarks varies according to degree of fame
Lexology
2022年 Any third party may file non-use revocation against trademark not used for three consecutive years
Lexology
2022年 Any third party may file non-use revocation against trademark not used for three consecutive years
ILO IP Newsletter (20220502)
2022年 商標権侵害の判断の際に商標の専用権放棄を声明した部分を考慮すべき旨が最高裁にて判示される
LEE & LI Bulletin - April 2022
2022年 Any Third Party May File Non-Use Revocation against a Trademark Not used for Three Consecutive Years
Lexology
2022年 Famous Trademarks Have Different Protection Scopes According to Their Degree of Fame
Lexology
2022年 Supreme Court clarifies that trademark disclaimers should be considered when assessing trademark infringement
Lexology, ILO IP Newsletter (20220228)

More


回上一頁