SiteMap  |  English  |  Janpanese
首頁 > 資料快訊 > AlertSheet
Key Points of the Newly Amended Settlement of Labor Disputes Act 2009/07/16
The amendment to the Settlement of Labor Disputes Act (the "Amendment") was approved by the Legislative Yuan on June 5, 2009 and publicly announced by the President on July 1, 2009. Since the Amendment significantly revised the Settlement of Labor Disputes Act, and it introduced the "Decision-Making Procedure" as a statutory dispute resolution proceeding, we hereby summarize below the Amendment. In addition, given that the effective date of the Amendment is to be further designated by the Executive Yuan, we expect that once the Legislative Yuan approves the amendment to the Labor Union Act, the Executive Yuan will publicly announce that the amendments to the three major labor legislation (the Labor Union Act, the Settlement of Labor Disputes Act and the Collective Agreement Act) shall take effect at the same time.
 
I. Conciliation
 
The Amendment stipulates that the competent authority where the worker involved in the dispute provides his/her services has jurisdiction to conduct the conciliation (Article 9). The Amendment adds the designated conciliator mechanism and sets forth the procedure of conciliation as follows:
 
1. Designation of Conciliator (Article 12)
 
The competent authority shall designate a conciliator within 3 days of receipt of the conciliation application form. The conciliator shall conduct the conciliation within 7 days of the designation, and conclude a conciliation proposal within 10 days of the conciliation.
 
2. Conciliation Commission (Articles 14-16)
 
The parties to the dispute shall select its own conciliator within 3 days of receipt of the notice from the competent authority. Within 14 days of completing the selection, the competent authority shall establish a conciliation commission and hold a conciliation meeting. Conciliators appointed by the commission to investigate the dispute shall submit the investigation report and solution proposal to the commission within 10 days of the appointment. The conciliation commission shall hold a meeting within 15 days (extendable by 7 days if necessary or with the parties' consent) of receipt of the investigation report and solution proposal to conclude a conciliation proposal.
 
II. Arbitration
 
This Amendment allows either party to a dispute of adjustment matters to submit the dispute to the competent authority for arbitration if (i) the worker is a teacher or is employed by the Department of Defense, its affiliated agencies or schools, or (ii) the employer is in the water-supply industry, power- or fuel- supply industry, medical-care institutions, financial information service industry conducting transfer and settlement of funds between banks, securities or futures trading, settlement, custody industry, or other business that handles payment systems, and the worker and employer failed to enter into terms and conditions regarding the required services (Article 25). This Amendment adds the single arbitrator mechanism and sets forth the procedure of arbitration as follows:
  
1. Single Arbitrator (Articles 27, 33, 35)
 
The parties to a dispute shall select a single arbitrator within 5 days of receipt of the notice from the competent authority. The single arbitrator shall investigate the dispute and provide the outcome of the investigation within 10 days of beginning the investigation. The single arbitrator shall make the arbitration judgment within 20 days (extendable by 10 days upon the parties' consent) of providing the outcome of the investigation.
 
2. Arbitration Commission (Articles 29, 31, 33, 35)
 
The parties to a dispute shall select their own arbitrators within 5 days of receipt of the notice from the competent authority. After the arbitrators are selected, the competent authority shall request the arbitrators to select a chief arbitrator within 7 days. The competent authority shall establish an arbitration commission within 14 days of the selection of the chief arbitrator and hold an arbitration meeting. The arbitrators designated by the arbitration commission to investigate the dispute shall submit the investigation result within 10 days of the designation. The arbitration commission shall conclude an arbitration judgment within 20 days (extendable by 10 days with the parties' consent) of receipt of the investigation result, and complete an arbitration award within 10 days of concluding the arbitration judgment.
 
III. Decision-Making Procedure
 
The decision-making procedure is a procedure first introduced by the Amendment. The grounds for filing for a decision may be (i) the dispute is over Paragraph 2, Article 35 of the Labor Union Act[1] ; or (ii) the dispute is over Paragraph 1, Article 35[2] of the Labor Union Act or Paragraph 1, Article 6[3] of the Collective Agreement Act. Procedures and the timetable for applying for a decision and obtaining a decision are as follows:
 
Within 7 days of receipt of the application form for decision, the competent authority shall hold a commissioners' meeting. The commissioner thus designated shall complete the investigation report within 20 days (extendable by 30 days if necessary) of the designation. Another commissioners' meeting shall be held within 7 days of the completion of the investigation report, and a decision shall be made within 30 days (extendable by 30 days with the consent of the majority of the commissioners) of the meeting (Articles 44, 45).
 
In addition, for decisions made for the civil disputes in accordance with Paragraph 2, Article 35 of the Labor Union Act, if either party fails to file a civil lawsuit against the other party to the dispute, or withdraws such lawsuit within 30 days of receipt of the original of the decision, the parties will be deemed to have reached an agreement on the decision. For decisions that are deemed to have been agreed on by the parties, the commission shall submit the decision to the court for approval within 7 days of the expiration of the above 30-day period. A decision approved by the court has the same effect as an irrevocable civil judgment (Article 49).
  
For decisions made for disputes in accordance with Paragraph 1, Article 35 of the Labor Union Act, or Paragraph 1, Article 6 of the Collective Agreement Act, if the decision indicated that the employer violated Paragraph 1, Article 35 of the Labor Union Act, or Paragraph 1, Article 6 of the Collective Agreement Act, the employer will be subject to an administrative fine in accordance with Article 45[4] of the Labor Union Act or Article 32[5] of the Collective Agreement Act. The party that is unsatisfied with the decision may bring administrative litigation within 2 months of receipt of the decision (Article 52).
 
IV. Protesting Activities
 
This Amendment adds the requirements and restrictions on protests as follows.
 
A labor union shall not call a strike until the strike has been approved by the majority of the members of the labor union via direct, anonymous vote. A labor union may not call a strike until the union and the employer have entered into terms and conditions for required services if the employer belongs to any of the following business: (i) water-supply business; (ii) power- or fuel- supply business; (iii) medical-care institutions; or (iv) financial information services business engaging in the transfer or settlement of funds between banks, securities or futures trading, settlement, custody business and other business handling payment systems (Article 54).
 
During the conciliation, arbitration or decision-making, a labor union may not call a strike or conduct other protesting activities. A protesting activity may be conducted only after the conciliation founders. A strike is not allowed if: (i) the disputes are related to right matters; or (ii) the workers are teachers or (the workers are employed by the Department of Defense or its affiliated agencies or schools (Article 54).
 
An employer may not claim damages arising from the protesting activities against the labor union or its members. Where the protesting activities conducted by the labor union or its members constitute a crime under the Criminal Code or other special criminal codes, such activities will not be punishable if there are legitimate reasons. However, such exception will not apply where a person's life or body is hurt or is likely to be hurt by force or intimidation (Article 55).
 
V. Penalty
 
During the conciliation, arbitration, and decision-making procedure, the parties and relevant persons shall cooperate with the investigation, and shall not make any false statements, provide untrue information or refuse to explain without legitimate reasons. A person who makes false statement or provides untrue information will be subject to administrative fines of NT$30,000 to NT$150,000. A person who refuses to explain or forbids the conciliator or conciliation commissioner to enter the sites of operations will be subject to an administrative fine of NT$10,000 to NT$50,000 (Article 63).
 
If the parties to the dispute fail to attend the conciliation meeting in accordance with the notice without legitimate reasons, they will be subject to an administrative fine of NT$2,000 to NT$10,000.
 
In addition, during the conciliation, arbitration or decision-making, the employer may not suspend business, terminate the operations, terminate the employment agreements or take any action against the workers' interests. Violation of this provision carries an administrative fine of NT$200,000 to NT$600,000 (Article 63).
 
We have established the Labor Practice Group specializing in the filed of labor affairs. Should you have any inquiries above the Amendment or other labor related laws and regulations, please feel free to contact our experts Mr. T.C. Chiang or Mr. Lawrence Yu.
 

Footnote :
1. Please note that the Labor Union Act referred to herein means the Amendment to the Labor Union Act approved by the Executive Yuan in 2009. Such Amendment has not been approved by the Legislative Yuan.
 
2. Article 35 of the Labor Union Act: An employer or a person with management authority acting on behalf of the employer may not commit any of the following acts: (i) deny the employment of, lay off, demote, or decrease the salary of a worker or otherwise mistreat the worker because of the worker's organizing or enrolling in the labor union or participating in the activities of the labor union or assuming official duties in the labor union; (ii) impose non-union membership or not serving as a union officer as the condition for hiring a worker or job-seeker; (iii) deny the employment of, lay off, demote, or decrease the salary of a worker or otherwise mistreat the worker because the worker requests a collective agreement or is involved in affairs related to a collective agreement; (iv) lay off, demote, or decrease the salary of a worker or otherwise mistreat the worker because the worker participates in or supports protesting activities; or (v) interfere with, prevent or forbid the incorporation, organization, or the activities of the labor union. The layoff, demotion, decrease of salary as indicated in the previous paragraph effected by an employer or a person exercising its management authority on behalf of the employer shall be null.
 
3. Paragraph 1, Article 6 of the Collective Agreement Ac: The employer and workers shall negotiate the collective agreement in good faith, and shall not refuse the negotiation proposed by the other party without legitimate reasons.
 
4. Article 45 of the Labor Union Act: If an employer violates Paragraph 1, Article 35 of the Labor Union Act and a decision has been made in accordance with the Settlement of Labor Disputes Act, the central competent authority will impose on the employer an administrative fine of NT$30,000 to NT$150,000. If an employer violates Item 1, 3, or 4, Paragraph 1, Article 35 and fails to take certain action or observe certain prohibition within the time limit set in the decision, the central competent authority will impose on the employer an administrative fine of NT$60,000 to NT$300,000. If an employer violates Item 2 or 5, Paragraph 1, Article 35 and fails to take certain action or observe certain prohibition within the time limit set in the decision in accordance with the first paragraph, an administrative fine of NT$60,000 to NT$300,000 will be imposed on the employer by the competent authority, and the competent authority may order the employer to take corrective measures within a time limit. Consecutive fines will be imposed on the employer if the employer fails to take corrective measures within the time limit.
 
5. Article 32 of the Collective Agreement Act: Where an employer or the workers violate Paragraph 1, Article 6 of the Collective Agreement Act, and a decision has been made in accordance with the Settlement of Labor Disputes Act, the violator will be imposed an administrative fine of NT$100,000 to NT$500,000. Failure to take certain action or observe certain prohibition within the time limit set in the decision will be imposed an administrative fine of NT$100,000 to NT$500,000, and the competent authority may order the violator to take corrective measures within a time limit. Consecutive fines will be imposed on the violator if the violator fails to take corrective measures within the time limit.
 
 
AlertSheet
Taiwan-- Existing Chemical Substance Nomination Regulation
Tax Alert - Corporate Tax Rate Reduced from 20% to 17%
新修正「個人資料保護法」
理律法律事務所新竹事務所—近期國內外訴訟案件之若干成果
兩岸金融、證券期貨、保險往來辦法發布施行
新修正「電信業及傳播業電腦處理個人資料管理辦法」
大陸及台灣農曆新年放假時間
公開收購相關法規最新修正要點
中国法律动态(201001)
台灣專利申請實務變更
中国法律动态 (200912)
中国法律动态 (200911)
中国法律动态 (200910)
Implementation of the New PRC (China) Patent Law on 1 October 2009
Ministry of Finance Promulgates Guidelines for Determining ROC-Sourced Income
中国法律动态 (200909)
中国法律动态 (200908)
勞資爭議處理法修正相關重點
Key Points of the Newly Amended Settlement of Labor Disputes Act
中國最高法院公佈“關於審理侵犯專利權糾紛案件應用法律若干問題的解釋”
中国法律动态 (200907)
中国法律动态 (200906)
中国法律动态 (200905)
中国法律动态 (200904)
中国法律动态 (200903)
中国法律动态 (200902)
中國專利法修正
經濟部智慧財產局發佈發明專利加速審查作業方案
Amendments to the Banking Act
中国法律动态 (200901)
大陸頒佈實施《勞動合同法實施條例》
美國專利暨商標局調漲規費事
大陸2008年8月1日開始實施反壟斷法
Announcement of Amended Patent Examination Guidelines for Computer Software Related Inventions
智慧財產法院之設立及相關新法介紹
歐洲專利局調漲規費事
團體協約法之修正
The relaxation of offshore funds' investment limit in derivatives
歐洲專利實務變動-歐洲專利聯盟之倫敦協議正式生效及專利優先權請求實務
Consideration Recognition of Foreign Search Reports and Examination Results in Examination of ROC (Taiwan) Patent Applications
美國專利暨商標局暫停實施專利實施細則修正事
美國專利暨商標局規費調漲事
證券交易法修正重點
Legal Update
公司法修正
Amendments to Financial Business Related Laws
Amendments of Taiwan Securities and Exchange Act
Legal Update
銀行辦理金融相關業務負面表列規定
公平交易委員會通過關於薦證廣告之規範說明草案 (廣告主、代言人及廣告業者都受到規範)
專利權及專門技術作價投資之課稅
理律雙月刊
理律專欄
公共議題
法令快訊
今日重點新聞